🔥 Idaho Central District Health Board Meeting (May 9, 2025) Updates
We asked for a vote Friday, May 9, 2025, to defund the Covid-19 shots and their promotion. 👎VOTE RESULTS & MORE. Posted 05/03/25. Updated 05/07/25, 05/09/25, 05/10/25, 05/12/25, 05/16/25.
🔥🛑💉Central District Health (CDH) Board voted to PERMANENTLY table the vote to defund and stop promoting COVID-19 mRNA Shots. This means, the COVID-19 gene therapy shots will continue to be offered by CDH. | See also Substack Note here
Recorded meeting and clips are below.
📋Motions
During the meeting, two motions were proposed:
The first motion proposed by Board member Jane Young was to PERMANENTLY table the discussion about stopping COVID-19 mRNA shots at CDH.
An amended motion proposed by Board member Clay Tucker was to TEMPORARILY table the discussion until the next (August 2025) meeting, after three vials of the current supply in CDH’s refrigerators could be tested by several outside laboratories. Dr. Ryan Cole said such testing would take about 2 weeks and be minimal cost (on the order of $150 each).
The first motion passed.
CDH members who voted for tabling the discussion permanently were Jane Young of Ada County, Betty Ann Nettleton and Crystal Rodgers of Elmore County, and Katlin Caldwell of Valley County.
CDH members who voted against tabling the discussion permanently were Ada County’s Dr. Ryan Cole and Dr. Greg Ferch and Boise County’s Clay Tucker.
The amended motion to temporarily table the discussion was not voted on because the original motion passed.
📌Parliamentary Rules — Possible Voting Error
(Updated 05/10/25)
In parliamentary procedure, typically under Robert's Rules of Order, an amended motion must be voted on before the original motion (as amended) is considered. Learn more.
Brian Almon of Gem State Chronicle suggested that taking a vote on the original motion before voting on the amendment may have violated parliamentary procedure.
We believe he is right, and additional parliamentary procedure (aka Robert’s Rules of Order) resources agree.
We asked Grok.com and confirmed Grok’s answer with additional research from “Robert’s Rules of Order” sources.
Note: You may get slightly different answers from Grok, who is very creative, but the basic results will be the same: The amended motion must be voted on before the original motion.
Q: Does parliamentary procedure require a vote on an amended motion before voting on the original notion?
A: In parliamentary procedure, such as under *Robert's Rules of Order*, an amended motion must be voted on before the original (main) motion. When an amendment is proposed, it modifies the main motion. The group first debates and votes on whether to accept the amendment. If the amendment passes, the main motion, as amended, is then debated and voted on. If the amendment fails, the original motion is voted on unchanged. This ensures that the group considers the proposed changes before deciding on the final motion.
So, yes, a vote on the amended motion (the amendment itself) is required before voting on the main motion, whether amended or not.
~~~~ another Grok response to the same question ~~~~
Q: Does parliamentary procedure require a vote on an amended motion before voting on the original notion?
A: In parliamentary procedure, typically governed by rules like Robert's Rules of Order, an amended motion must be voted on before the original motion (as amended) is considered. Here's how it works:
1. Motion Introduced: A main motion is proposed.
2. Amendment Proposed: A member moves to amend the main motion (e.g., by adding, deleting, or changing text).
3. Vote on Amendment: The amendment is debated and voted on first. If the amendment passes, it modifies the main motion.
4. Vote on Main Motion: The main motion, as amended (if the amendment passed), is then debated and voted on. If the amendment failed, the original motion is voted on unchanged.
The key principle is that amendments are resolved before the final vote on the main motion to ensure clarity on what is being voted on. Voting on the original motion without first resolving the amendment would violate standard procedure.
If you have a specific context (e.g., a particular organization's rules or a unique situation), let me know, and I can tailor the answer further!
📫Open Follow-Up Letter to Central District Health
Central District Health Follow Up To May 9 2025 Meeting Open Letter
Open follow-up letter to CDH Director and Board written by private citizen. Topics:
📌 Parliamentary Procedure Likely Violated
📌 Special Meeting Needed
📌Testing Needed
📌 Vaccine Information Sheets — Informed Consent
📌On a Personal Note...
I was shocked by the lack of curiosity and desire to wash their hands of the matter by the four
CDH board members who chose to permanently table discussion regarding COVID-19 shot
safety. This makes me wonder...
❓ Why wouldn’t all CDH members want more time and more information about what’s in
their fridge before closing their minds to further discussion?
❓ Shouldn't all CDH members be guardians for safety and informed consent of those
being injected by their health district?
❓ Why wouldn't all CDH members want to know if the shots are contaminated, especially
since they can find out quickly and inexpensively?
❓ Does the motion to permanently halt all further discussion on this matter increase or
decrease public trust in CDH?
Thanks to those who wrote into CDH to support withdrawing the COVID-19 genetic therapy injections. We’ll have to hope that Federal HHS, FDA, CDC, and other agencies will take steps to withdraw these COVID-19 gene therapies and remove them from all vaccination schedules.
👍 Good News
Dr. Greg Ferch will remain CDH Chair and Clay Tucker will remain CDH Vice Chair.
Related Efforts and Articles:
Recordings from the Idaho Central District Health board meeting, May 9.
We lost the vote, but won an important next step! By Sasha Latypova (05/16/25): Read
Idaho's County Commissioners Advise Against Gene Therapy Shots + Medical Freedom Act. A dedicated team successfully encouraged Commissioners in several Idaho Counties to advise against Gene Therapy Shots. Shots pulled in ID + WA Health Districts. You can help! Read
_______________________________________
Original Call to Action (05/03/25)
The following message and sample letter are from Laura Demaray, who has been instrumental in assembling science teams, presenting information about the harmful mRNA platform — especially Covid-19 shots — and achieving resolutions to stop recommending and/or to defund these medical interventions.
We hope you will help by respectfully writing to the Idaho Central District Health (CDH) Board asking them to vote at their next board meeting, May 9, 2025, to defund the Covid-19 shots and to defund their promotion, like Southwest District Health did last October.
Thanks for reading Big E’s Big Mouth Substack! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
On May 9, 2025, our science team is presenting to the Central District Health (CDH) Board to discuss the adverse effects of the gene therapy Covid-19 immunization which has caused unprecedented harm to Idahoans and to the nation.
Please respectfully, sincerely, and politely write the CDH Board and Director and help us encourage a vote at their next board meeting, May 9, to defund the Covid-19 immunization and to defund its promotion, like Southwest District Health did last October.
Please feel free to copy, cut paste any part of the sample letter below and use as your own and/or feel free to share your own story of harm or your concerns about the harmful product. Please share this request also with your Idaho readers and friends.
Please join us, in person or online, for the science team presentation on May 9th if you’re available — but most importantly, please pray for us.
Please pray that the CDH Board and the Director's hearts are moved to hold the line for humanity and are emboldened to defund the harmful Covid-19 shots.
Thank you so much for your time, your help, and for your prayers.
Laura Demaray ldemarayrn@protonmail.com ____________________________
Laura’s Sample Letter
(feel free to customize with your own thoughts and experiences)
____________________________
Dear Honorable Dr. Ferch, Mr. Tucker, Mrs. Nettleton, Dr. Young, Dr. Cole, Mrs. Rodgers, and Mrs. Caldwell,
I am reaching out to thank you for permitting a presentation this May 9th to discuss crucial information regarding the adverse effects of the gene therapy vaccine technology, such as the Covid 19 injection. Our community and my family deeply appreciate that the honorable Central District Health board members are taking the time to have a collaborative dialogue with subject matter experts and discuss the risks, the mechanisms of injury, and the harm done to Idahoans and thousands of Americans.
I humbly ask that the CDH board members sincerely consider a vote to defund the Covid shots and their promotion due to unprecedented cases of harm to local Idahoans, many constituents in the Central District Health region, as well as the harm documented in the only publicly available safety signal system, VAERS (www.openvaers.com).
Southwest District Health defunded Covid shot and its promotion; four other counties also signed resolutions to protect the public from risk-laden Covid-19 immunizations.
🆕 Twelve-Month All-Cause Mortality after Initial COVID-19 Vaccination with Pfizer-BioNTech or mRNA-1273 among Adults Living in Florida. By Retsef Levi, Fahad Mansuri, Melissa M. Jordan, Joseph A. Ladapo (04/29/25)
Volumes of evidence, data, cases, and peer reviewed studies that show harm, with links included in this letter and also attached.
To purchase, allow, administer, or promote the Covid-19 shot in any CDH clinic conveys to the public that it is safe and approved by the board for consumption. The community relies on your valuable judgement to vet all products and your allowance indicates a tacit approval of the product.
Please vote on May 9th to publicly defund the Covid-19 immunization and remove it from CDH clinics due to confirmed harm, potential high risk of adverse effects, and lack of long-term studies.
Please defund and remove the Covid-19 immunizations until:
Successful double blind placebo long-term studies are complete;
Transparent and accurate informed consent is given to citizens of Idaho; and
Fair recourse and compensation can be provided to those harmed by the experimental immunization.
This subject is very important to Idahoans. Thank you so much for your time and consideration of this heartfelt request, and thank you again for facilitating the May 9th scientific discussion.
Sincerely,
Your name and contact info here
Attachments:
2025 Central District Health State of Idaho Resolution Updated.pdf
Fleetwood et al Compilation and Commentary of Studies that Prove Adverse Effects-Reason to Defund and Remove from Clinics.pdf (full 49-page version of Fleetwood document)
2025 Central District Health State Of Idaho Resolution Updated
Big E - I’m sure you’ve already seen this. This study could provide more ammo.
https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/safe-but-risky-saturday-may-3-2025
Praying for your success. 🙏🙏🙏