I scroll through what you've written but usually can't go into depth of anything you've linked to.
Regarding Unbekoming, I have been getting Bitdefender red flags from this Substack, to the point in which I've unsubscribed. It doesn't matter if I go on the email link or open it within Substack. I trust Bitdefender that there's something going on with this author's posts. I read somewhere that some people are thinking that Unbekoming is AI-generated. IDK. But I won't risk my computer getting corrupted to subscribe or read it.
Thanks for your feedback! The whole reason we summarize is that so you don't have to go into depth if you don't subscribe to the other stacks, or you don't have time. So maybe we're doing our job (LOL).
We recall that you've had odd problems with your system before. We don't use Bitdefender (or VPN) so that's likely the issue.
I read the first part (animals and nature), skip the Idaho part, then check the other items - most of them I already read in their own site as I subscribe to all of these. This year though, I am going to give up a few since I got way too many. You know the problem, according to the title of your stack!
The ones you had listed today were those I read on their own site - Unbekoming is almost always read and so is Sasha. Very often I also read the Malone posts. Other stacks are sometimes just browsed quickly without a full read. I read less and less politics. Not interested in the uniparty!
Agree about uniparty. We omit most political coverage unless it’s essential for Idaho or for those who still believe their vote matters (it does!).
Mostly we have been trying to offer resources for those who don’t know about alternative non government explanations relating to health — especially “vaccines“ — and those with little time to read full source articles. And, of course, the much needed Day Brighteners our spouse finds.
Do you read Amuse?
https://newsletter.amuseonx.com/p/taxpayers-are-bankrolling-the-socialist
I scroll through what you've written but usually can't go into depth of anything you've linked to.
Regarding Unbekoming, I have been getting Bitdefender red flags from this Substack, to the point in which I've unsubscribed. It doesn't matter if I go on the email link or open it within Substack. I trust Bitdefender that there's something going on with this author's posts. I read somewhere that some people are thinking that Unbekoming is AI-generated. IDK. But I won't risk my computer getting corrupted to subscribe or read it.
Thanks for your feedback! The whole reason we summarize is that so you don't have to go into depth if you don't subscribe to the other stacks, or you don't have time. So maybe we're doing our job (LOL).
We recall that you've had odd problems with your system before. We don't use Bitdefender (or VPN) so that's likely the issue.
So far, Bitdefender hasn't done me wrong. VPN, well that's a separate issue.
Just for the heck of it, we asked Grok about any issues with Bitdefender. It highlighted some, which are linked here in case you're interested: https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtMi1jb3B5_3de82d1c-e377-4e2c-9e2f-3b40ba9e8284
I read the first part (animals and nature), skip the Idaho part, then check the other items - most of them I already read in their own site as I subscribe to all of these. This year though, I am going to give up a few since I got way too many. You know the problem, according to the title of your stack!
Thank you, Ingrid. Feedback much appreciated!
Question: If you gave up any stacks that you currently read, would the summaries we provide be helpful to you? More helpful? Less helpful? Same?
The ones you had listed today were those I read on their own site - Unbekoming is almost always read and so is Sasha. Very often I also read the Malone posts. Other stacks are sometimes just browsed quickly without a full read. I read less and less politics. Not interested in the uniparty!
Agree about uniparty. We omit most political coverage unless it’s essential for Idaho or for those who still believe their vote matters (it does!).
Mostly we have been trying to offer resources for those who don’t know about alternative non government explanations relating to health — especially “vaccines“ — and those with little time to read full source articles. And, of course, the much needed Day Brighteners our spouse finds.